Cases 1 - 10 of 889
Smith v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv03645
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Treheem Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Solomon v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv03598
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Eric Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv03519
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Romelle Darryl Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Buckhanan v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv03430
Petitioner:
Xavier Jerome Buckhanan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dunn v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv03323
Petitioner:
Darnell Andre Dunn
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Voelz v. USA
as 0:2024cv03042
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Voelz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Perez v. USA
as 0:2024cv02694
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Santos Gomez Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Valentino v. USA
as 0:2024cv02527
Petitioner:
Justice Anthony Valentino
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sanchez-Acuna v. USA
as 0:2024cv02526
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gerardo Sanchez-Acuna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McCaskel v. USA
as 0:2024cv02495
Petitioner:
Dominique Marquise McCaskel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
