General Cases filed in Texas
Cases 91 - 100 of 42,012
Hicks v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00133
Petitioner: Traylin Dashaun Hicks
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jordan v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00087
Petitioner: Jerome Jordan
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arellano v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02116
Petitioner: Wilberto Arellano
Respondent: Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simpson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02126
Petitioner: James Burchard Simpson
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Director TDCJ
as 1:2024cv00211
Petitioner: Joshua Mazique Burton
Respondent: Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibbs, Jr. v. Warden of FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00210
Petitioner: Levi Gibbs, Jr.
Respondent: Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lazzarino v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00396
Petitioner: Anthony Lazzarino
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kindred v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00219
Petitioner: Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01546
Petitioner: Johnny Richardson
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cantu Vela v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00149
Petitioner: Horacio Cantu Vela
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?