Cases 61 - 70 of 42,016
Campos v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
John Michael Campos
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director
as 5:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Reidie Jackson
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vidal v. King et al
as 3:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Tommy Ray Vidal, Thomas Ray Gonzales and Tommy Gonzales
Respondent:
Adam King and Leslie Rachael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ramirez-Amaris v. FCI Big Spring Warden
as 1:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Evanan Jose Ramirez-Amaris
Respondent:
FCI Big Spring Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01425
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallman v. Waybourn
as 4:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Robert F Hallman
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nobles v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Dennis Germaine Nobles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Perez et al
as 6:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Roman J. Henry
Defendant:
Sergio Perez, Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01415
Petitioner:
Joel Garcia Nunez
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parmer v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Robert B Parmer
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
