General Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 42,016
Pearson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00095
Petitioner: Rickey Delwin Pearson, Jr.
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reaves v. Smith
as 3:2024cv01631
Petitioner: Samuel Lyn Reaves
Respondent: Kevin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solis v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00255
Petitioner: Arturo Solis
Respondent: Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McPherson v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 2:2024cv00148
Petitioner: Amario Lynn McPherson
Respondent: Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00228
Petitioner: Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00159
Petitioner: Darryl Glenn Davis
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguyen v. Bergami
as 3:2024cv01601
Petitioner: Xuan Nguyen
Respondent: Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McGhee v. Mooneyham
as 3:2024cv01618
Petitioner: Brendshon McGhee
Respondent: Debery Mooneyham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Reaves v. Smith
as 7:2024cv00092
Petitioner: Samuel Lyn Reaves
Respondent: Kevin Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00253
Petitioner: Casey Michael Taylor
Respondent: Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?