Cases 1 - 10 of 41,978
Jackson v. Dallas County Jail
as 3:2024cv01436
Petitioner:
Keontrey Jackson
Respondent:
Dallas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
In Re: French
as 4:2024cv02232
Petitioner:
Kyle French and Alicia Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Director TDCJ
as 1:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Sugar Ray Thomas
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez-Amaris v. FCI Big Spring Warden
as 1:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Evanan Jose Ramirez-Amaris
Respondent:
FCI Big Spring Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01425
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallman v. Waybourn
as 4:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Robert F Hallman
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Parmer v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01412
Petitioner:
Robert B Parmer
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casterberry v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Anthony Lavelle Casterberry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nobles v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Dennis Germaine Nobles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Perez et al
as 6:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Roman J. Henry
Defendant:
Sergio Perez, Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
