Cases 111 - 120 of 5,537
Surles v. Bell
as 2:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Christopher Surles
Defendant:
Mr Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Horton, et al
as 7:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Mario Maldonado Moreno
Defendant:
Jonathan Horton, Chief Administrator Bullock, Captain XFord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Bibb County Correctional Facility Medical Staff
as 7:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Terry Perkins
Defendant:
Bibb County Correctional Facility Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharifi v. Broussard
as 5:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
Robert Broussard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pritchett v. Alabama Department of Corrections (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Burlin Richard Pritchett
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hal Marshall
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County and Bud Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cable v. Madison County Probation & Parole Department et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00660
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Cable
Defendant:
Madison County Probation & Parole Department, Bridget McGraw, Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huey v. Dixon
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
William Bart Huey
Defendant:
Travontay Lee Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Taite v. Westry Robinson et al
as 1:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Marcus O. Taite
Defendant:
Briana Westry Robinson and Insurance Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
