Cases 21 - 30 of 13,556
Bailey v. Core Civic
as 3:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Jamie Bailey
Defendant:
Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Core Civic, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Jones
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Correctional Health Care Companies, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Terrance Burnett
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Dickson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Ronnie McCoy
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff Office, Sheriff Eads, Chief Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clem v. Rausch
as 3:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Clem
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Cortney Perry
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Grady Perry, James Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Fast Access Correctional Health Care
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Wright
Defendant:
Fast Access Correctional Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Parton et al
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee
Defendant:
Chad Parton, Tammy Warren and Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Makupson v. Jacobs et al
as 1:2024mc00024
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anthony Makupson
Defendant:
Glenn Jacobs, Ricky Oates, Duane Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
