Cases 11 - 20 of 1,348
Henderson v. Shiv Hospitality Group Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Sharon Henderson
Defendant:
Shiv Hospitality Group Inc and Praful Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Opseth v. Pleasant Valley County Club
as 4:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Roger Opseth
Defendant:
Pleasant Valley County Club
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Morgan v. JPW Holdings LLC
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Teresa Morgan
Defendant:
JPW Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Tripp v. MaxAuto Detailing, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv05009
Plaintiff:
Orlando Tripp
Defendant:
MaxAuto Detailing, LLC and Trudy Balsamel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Crouch v. Royal Overhead Door, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05001
Plaintiff:
Travis Crouch
Defendant:
Royal Overhead Door, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Summage et al v. Forrest City Arkansas, City of
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Willie Summage, Terrence Triggs and Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Forrest City Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Popp v. Precision Led Lighting LLC et al
as 3:2024cv03002
Plaintiff:
Montana Popp
Defendant:
Precision Led Lighting LLC and Tyler Chase Tedder
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pippen v. PLD Transport, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv06143
Plaintiff:
John Pippen
Defendant:
PLD Transport, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Holmes v. AmerCable Corporation
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Steven Holmes
Defendant:
Amercable Corporation doing business as Nexans Amercable, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fenley v. Quapaw Baths, LLC
as 6:2023cv06138
Plaintiff:
Cinthia Fenley
Defendant:
Quapaw Baths, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
