Cases 41 - 50 of 728
WALTERS v. DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2023cv02887
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WALTERS
Defendant:
DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
WING et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE et al
as 2:2023cv02844
Plaintiff:
BRET WING and SHARON JERMANY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, MELISSA SAULS, MELISSA MCGRATH and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
STOUFFER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
MARK STOUFFER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
WILLIAMS v. PROSPECT CCMC, LLC
as 2:2023cv02467
Plaintiff:
KIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PROSPECT CCMC, LLC doing business as CROZER CHESTER MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
CATTERALL v. PUREPENN LLC
as 2:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
JAMES CATTERALL
Defendant:
TRULIEVE CANNABIS CORPORATION and PUREPENN LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
GRIFFIN v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING
as 2:2023cv02377
Plaintiff:
ERICA GRIFFIN
Defendant:
PENSKE TRUCK LEASING
GRIFFIN v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING
as 5:2023cv02377
Plaintiff:
ERICA GRIFFIN
Defendant:
PENSKE TRUCK LEASING
PENA v. OLDCASTLE APG NORTHEAST, INC.
as 2:2023cv02274
Plaintiff:
ANGEL PENA
Defendant:
OLDCASTLE APG, INC., OLDCASTLE APG, INC. doing business as ANCHOR A CRH COMPANY and OLDCASTLE APG NORTHEAST, INC. doing business as ANCHOR A CRH COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
PEA v. OLDCASTLE APG, INC.
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
ANGEL PEA
Defendant:
OLDCASTLE APG, INC. doing business as ANCHOR A CRH COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
DWYER v. FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC et al
as 2:2023cv02055
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dwyer
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC and FEDEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
