Cases 21 - 30 of 698
Stone v. CITY OF LANCASTER
as 5:2023cv04187
Plaintiff:
Geoff Stone
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
PANOS v. AXIOM BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2023cv04071
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PANOS
Defendant:
AXIOM BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Ciccotto v. Axiom Bank National Association
as 2:2023cv04069
Plaintiff:
Paul Ciccotto
Defendant:
Axiom Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
BOZEMAN v. CINTAS, et al
as 2:2023cv01815
Plaintiff:
IRENE BOZEMAN
Defendant:
IDERMA CINTAS, RONA CINTAS, MATTHEW BADLEY CINTAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Malloy et al v. Temple Family Practice Plan
as 2:2023cv03774
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Malloy and Colleen Rabbitt
Defendant:
Temple Family Practice Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. Axis Energy Services, LLC
as 4:2023cv01588
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Axis Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
LAMONT v. KENCO ENGINEERING, INC
as 2:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
CLIFF LAMONT
Defendant:
KENCO ENGINEERING, INC doing business as KENCO WEAR PARTS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Brooks v. NVK Logistrics, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01556
Plaintiff:
Danielle A. Brooks
Defendant:
NVK Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PUGH v. VALMONT INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
RONALD PUGH
Defendant:
VALMONT INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
WALRATH v. SELFRIDGE et al
as 2:2023cv03053
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WALRATH
Defendant:
MELISSA SELFRIDGE, BRIAN COSGROVE and USA COIL AND AIR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
