Cases 41 - 50 of 9,388
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Aujla et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 2:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Ramanjot Singh Aujla and Daisy Aujla
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bozicevic v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bozicevic
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Carbajal v. Home Depot Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Ivonne Carbajal
Defendant:
Home Depot Incorporated and Validity Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
McDonough v. Bidwill et al
as 2:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Terence William McDonough
Defendant:
Michael J Bidwill and Arizona Cardinals Football Club LLC doing business as Arizona Cardinals
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Debra Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Beam v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2024cv08066
Plaintiff:
Ina Beam
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Bitah v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2024cv08067
Plaintiff:
Lula Ben Bitah
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
