Cases 21 - 30 of 8,479
Ennis v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Sandre Ennis
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., Crown FDO L.L.C., Asbury Automotive North Carolina Dealership Holdings L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. et al v. FREITAS
as 1:2024cv00496
Petitioner:
AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. and AMAZON.COM, INC.
Respondent:
CHRISTIANO FREITAS
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Recall of Bankruptcy Judge J. Craig Whitley
as 3:2024mc00090
Cause Of Action: Administrative Order
Gross v. SmartSky Networks, LLC
as 5:2023cv00731
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Dubar v. Brown et al
as 7:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Marian Elizabeth Dubar
Defendant:
Christopher M. Brown d/b/a CMB Leland Storage, LLC and Leland Self Storage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The North Carolina State Bar v. McDaniel
as 5:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
The North Carolina State Bar
Defendant:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HUFFMAN v. AVANTCREDIT LLC
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
SHARON CARVER HUFFMAN
Defendant:
AVANTCREDIT LLC doing business as AVANT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Marcano v. Wright et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
C.J. Mahan Construction Company LLC v. Lambert Engineering and Construction Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00326
Petitioner:
C.J. Mahan Construction Company LLC
Respondent:
Lambert Engineering and Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hankins v. The US Custom and Border Protection et al
as 7:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr.
Defendant:
The US Custom and Border Protection and The US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
