Cases 11 - 20 of 23,580
Rabo Agrifinance, LLC v. Pamma et al
as 2:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
Rabo Agrifinance, LLC
Defendant:
Sukhraj Pamma, Jaismin Pamma, Imperial Orchards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
(UD)(PS) Liu v. McIntyre et al
as 2:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Zhuo Yao Liu
Defendant:
Tiffany Angelique McIntyre and Troy Lamont Finley, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
SFR Borrower 22-00001 LLC v. Kareem Couch et al
as 5:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
SFR Borrower 2022-1 LLC
Defendant:
Kareem Couch and Does 1 to 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Gustin v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2024cv02917
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gustin
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Streams Apartments, LP v. Marjorie Francisco et al
as 8:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Streams Apartments, LP
Defendant:
Marjorie Francisco, Alberto Lim, Elaine Santiago and others
Caprera v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv02860
Plaintiff:
Anthony Caprera
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rieffel v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv02859
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Rieffel
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
City of Pomona v. The Dow Chemical Company, et al.
as 2:2024cv03957
Plaintiff:
City of Pomona
Defendant:
Dow Chemical Company The and Shell USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tara Siener v. Christopher Myers et al
as 2:2024cv03983
Plaintiff:
Tara Siener
Defendant:
Christopher Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lynn Macy v. San Bernardino County Building and Safety Department
as 5:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Lynn Macy
Defendant:
San Bernardino County Building and Safety Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
