Cases 101 - 110 of 6,770
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Elliott v. Rowan County Schools Board of Education et al
as 0:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
John Elliott
Defendant:
Rowan County Schools Board of Education and Michael Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. United Healthcare of Kentucky, LTD.
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Russell Roberts
Defendant:
United Healthcare of Kentucky, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Walker et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker and Amber Bishop
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, City of Harrodsburg, Kentucky and J.D. Pal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lillacalenia v. City of Louisville
as 3:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
City of Louisville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lillacalenia v. City of Louisville
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
City of Louisville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lillacalenia v. Vue At 3rd Street
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Dahved Malik Lillacalenia
Defendant:
Vue At 3rd Street
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
