Cases 41 - 50 of 19,817
JOHNSON v. 1011778 B.C. UNLIMITED LIABILTY COMPANY et al
as 3:2024cv06914
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
1011778 B.C. UNLIMITED LIABILTY COMPANY, 1019334 B.C. UNLIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, BURGER KING CANADA HOLDING INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KANTH v. PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
as 3:2024cv06848
Plaintiff:
DR. RAJANI KANTH
Defendant:
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRYCELAND v. GUT
as 2:2024cv06863
Plaintiff:
MARTA BRYCELAND
Defendant:
THOMAS GUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YEW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2024cv06851
Plaintiff:
TONY PING YEW
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW JERSEY, HON. DENNIS NIEVES, HON. JOSEPH REA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PALIN v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2024cv06747
Plaintiff:
TANAJZA PALIN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, PATRICK J. CALLAHAN, L. BADIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
