Cases 91 - 100 of 5,797
Hacket v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv02533
Petitioner:
Robert A. Hacket
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King v. Belinger et al
as 0:2024cv02585
Defendant:
Trisha Williams and Belinger
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCaskel v. USA
as 0:2024cv02495
Petitioner:
Dominique Marquise McCaskel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dixon v. Garland et al
as 0:2024cv02491
Respondent:
Marcos Charlos, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and others
Petitioner:
Carlos Prince Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arellano v. Eischen et al
as 0:2024cv02478
Petitioner:
Clayton Arellano
Respondent:
FPC Duluth and B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Voeltz v. Rish
as 0:2024cv02481
Respondent:
Kris Rish
Petitioner:
Weston Marshal Voeltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allan v. Harpstead
as 0:2024cv02458
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooley v. Dakota County Jail Kitchen Staff/Medical Staff
as 0:2024cv02457
Plaintiff:
Morye Cooley
Defendant:
ACH, Dakota County Jail Kitchen Staff/Medical Staff and Summit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kalichenko v. Sepal et al
as 0:2024cv02426
Plaintiff:
Olena Kalichenko
Defendant:
Captain Koch, Unit Manager Kopischke and Warden Michael Sepal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tumbaco Malave v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv02404
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Juan Salcedo Tumbaco Malave
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
