Cases 101 - 110 of 12,943
Mathews v. Guinn et al
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Melvin Deandre Mathews
Defendant:
Sherri Guinn, Christian County Jail and Kenton County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lauderdale v. Grayson County et al
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Lamone Lauderdale
Defendant:
Grayson County, Jason Woosley, Jack Pinckert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bixler v. USA
as 5:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Bixler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lee v. USA
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
James Steven Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fugate v. Shelby County Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
William L. Fugate
Defendant:
Shelby County Detention Center, Shelby County Detention Medical Department and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Hensley et al
as 0:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Evan M. White
Defendant:
Jailer William D. Hensley, Nurse Trish Unknown and Boyd County Fiscal Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Roby
as 6:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thornton v. Wellpath et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael Thornton
Defendant:
Wellpath, W. Whitney, Srinath Kamineni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Bradley
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kareem M. Edwards
Defendant:
Warden David Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dike v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Vickie Diane Dike
Defendant:
David Knight, Trey English, Heather McGinness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
