Cases 101 - 110 of 50,158
Williams v. Frisina et al
as 9:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
D. Frisina, S. Jackson, Phil Melecio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. USA
as 1:2024cv03690
Petitioner:
Edwin Maldonado, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pedrow v. Barbour et al
as 1:2024cv04010
Defendant:
All Social Media Platforms et al., W. Barbour, Twitter) et al. and others
Plaintiff:
Jahiem Pedrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fate v. Yonkers Police Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv04100
Plaintiff:
Forest L. Fate, Sr.
Defendant:
Yonkers Police Dept., The City of Yonkers Commissioner and Westchester County Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abellard v. M.J. King
as 1:2024cv03719
Plaintiff:
Euzebelin Abellards
Defendant:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06318
Petitioner:
Jose L. Torres
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Baxter et al
as 6:2024cv06321
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Todd K. Baxter, Matt Vanduzee, Hon. James E. Walsh, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Arroyo et al
as 2:2024cv03757
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Sutton
Defendant:
Sgt. Judy Arroyo, PO Ashley Raaf, PO Rooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Zimmerman et al
as 1:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Darnell Hicks
Defendant:
Captain Zimmerman, Ossining NY OVAC, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pagan v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv04095
Petitioner:
Wilson Pagan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
