Cases 111 - 120 of 13,062
Stanley v. Officer Palmer et al
as 5:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bernard Stanley, Jr.
Defendant:
Bourbon County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martinez v. United States Office of the Attorney General et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Defendant:
United States Office of the Attorney General and Mr. Merrick Garland
Plaintiff:
Leonel Miranda Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNutt v. Claud
as 5:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jesse R. McNutt
Defendant:
Calloway Co. Jailer Ken Claud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Okum et al v. County of Christian, KY et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Defendant:
Gregory Corteze, Joshua Stallons, County of Christian, KY and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Okum and Jacquelyn B. Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Chaney et al
as 3:2024cv00386
Defendant:
Ofc. Alex W. Thomas, Ofc. Derron Scales and Sgt. Bobbie D. Chaney
Plaintiff:
Ryan David Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. McKenzie
as 5:2024cv00118
Respondent:
Warden Shawn McKenzie
Petitioner:
Joseph Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thurman v. Crews et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Defendant:
Brianna Capel, Stacy Gibson, Cookie Crews and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Thurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. McKenzie
as 0:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Joseph Williams
Respondent:
Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rankins v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jonathan M. Rankins
Defendant:
Boyer and P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Potter v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2024cv00065
Defendant:
Shawn McKenzie and Cookie Crews
Plaintiff:
James Carr Potter, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
