Cases 131 - 140 of 11,035
Vigil v. GEO Group Inc
as 5:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Kevin Vigil
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc doing business as Lawton Correctional and Rehabilitation Facility The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Self v. Harpe
as 4:2024cv00311
Petitioner:
Derrick Wayne Self
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purdy v. Carter et al
as 5:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Purdy
Defendant:
FNU Able, Jackson County Jail, Lieutenant FNU Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mathis v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Lennie Dartez Mathis
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Jackson County Sheriff's Office
as 5:2024cv00658
Defendant:
Oklahoma Supreme Court Network, Altus Police Department and Jackson County Sheriffs Office
Plaintiff:
Ramon Montique Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Triplet v. Ninh et al
as 5:2024cv00659
Defendant:
Jacob Embery, Kyle Croft, Midwest City City of and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Montrail Triplet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Truong et al
as 5:2024cv00649
Defendant:
Vicki Behenna, Emily Grossnicklaus and Cindy H Truong
Plaintiff:
William Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanz-Carver v. Oklahoma County District Court
as 6:2024cv00218
Respondent:
Oklahoma County District Court
Petitioner:
Kyle Sanz-Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sutton v. McClendon
as 6:2024cv00219
Respondent:
Frankie McClendon
Petitioner:
Joshua Lamont Sutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00646
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Nicois Megale Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
