Cases 161 - 170 of 1,293
Benter v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, North Dakota Dept. of Corrections, Randy McGoningal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
Nathaniel Smith, Tracy Monson and Vicki Steckler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Morse et al
as 1:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
Doug Morse, Captain Ebach, Shannon Davison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 3:2022cv00175
Petitioner:
David Michael Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Benter v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 1:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Dept. of Corrections, Stephanie Keuhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Schroeder et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
Tammy Schroeder, Jesse Thompson, Randy McGonigal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benter v. Nelson et al
as 1:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Defendant:
Jana Nelson, Deb Houdek, M. Hundley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baggett v. USA
as 1:2022cv00165
Petitioner:
Ethan Allan Baggett
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harris v. USA
as 3:2022cv00178
Petitioner:
Jovan Marquis Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bridges v. Director of the North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 1:2022cv00163
Petitioner:
John Clark Bridges
Respondent:
Director of the North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
