Cases 11 - 20 of 50,552
Walker v. Tonkery et al
as 6:2024cv06457
Defendant:
Joseph Earner, Bradley Tonkery, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawn v. Williams et al
as 9:2024cv01137
Defendant:
Sgt. Slate and Bryon Williams
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hawn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trzuskot v. The State of New York
as 1:2024cv07110
Respondent:
The State of New York
Petitioner:
Magdalena Trzuskot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Colombe v. Sullivan Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv06993
Plaintiff:
Gerald F. Colombe
Defendant:
Sullivan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weingarten v. Maldonado
as 1:2024cv06461
Respondent:
Warden Raul Maldonado, Jr.
Petitioner:
Shmiel Weingarten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collier v. Lowerre
as 9:2024cv01115
Petitioner:
Rahcief Collier
Respondent:
Ernest Lowerre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Phillips et al
as 9:2024cv01117
Defendant:
John Doe, Ferrone, Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyave-Ramirez v. FCI Otisville
as 1:2024cv06985
Respondent:
Warden FCI Otisville
Petitioner:
Andres Fernando Arroyave-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gerbrick v. Green Haven Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv07063
Defendant:
Green Haven Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Clyde Gerbrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moments v. Warden (John Doe) et al
as 1:2024cv07065
Defendant:
Warden (John Doe), Inmate Cashier, Grievance Committee Supervision/Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Betta Moments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
