Cases 31 - 40 of 32,506
Huffman v. Helton
as 7:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Huffman
Defendant:
Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv01059
Petitioner:
Michael Alonzo Robinson, Jr.
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. USA
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
John L. Brooks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McCord v. USA
as 3:2024cv00448
Petitioner:
Lamont E. McCord
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Turner v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00394
Petitioner:
Marvin Sirrelle Turner
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reid v. Employees of the Virginia Department of Corrections
as 7:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Frank E. Reid
Defendant:
Employees of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis and Jaeon Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdussalaam v. The State of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00381
Petitioner:
Munir-Ibn Sami Abdussalaam
Respondent:
The State of Virginia, Amherst County Adult Detention Center and Appomattox Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00380
Petitioner:
Michael Alonzo Robinson, Jr.
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Day v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Lantz Domoench Day
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Jessee Holbrook, Dr. McDuffie, Ms. Brookshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
