Cases 41 - 50 of 32,919
Patterson v. Rockbridge Regional Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00622
Defendant:
Officer Cody Hensley, Lt. Chad Hamilton and Rockbridge Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
David Patterson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Graham
as 7:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Ta'Kaun Bingham
Defendant:
Patrick Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Echevarria v. Britt et al
as 1:2024cv01608
Defendant:
King, Britt and I. Esochaghi
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dakel Echevarria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whinsenton v. Sussex I State Prison et al
as 1:2024cv01609
Defendant:
Sussex I State Prison, Henson and McCoy
Plaintiff:
Lavest Whinsenton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Ramey et al
as 1:2024cv01610
Defendant:
T. Smith and K. D. Ramey
Plaintiff:
Ta'Kuan Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Bahoujabour v. Alpos et al
as 1:2024cv01611
Plaintiff:
Chouaib Bahoujabour
Defendant:
Deputy Smith, Deputy E. Clark, Nurse Jakie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Artrip
as 7:2024cv00619
Respondent:
Warden Jeffery Artrip
Petitioner:
Aaron Randolph Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burdett v. Abingdon Regional Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Marcus Burdett
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Duffield Regional Jail and Abingdon Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lydon v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00546
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Petitioner:
Kevin M. Lydon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mujibullah v. Alpos et al
as 2:2024cv00547
Defendant:
Cruz, Sergent Alpos, Lieutenant Flowers and others
Plaintiff:
Azizi Mujibullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
