Cases 41 - 50 of 39,647
LANGHAM v. HUNT
as 5:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
BRYAN DALE LANGHAM
Defendant:
DR CYNTHIA HUNT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Sheriff Bobb
as 1:2024cv02124
Petitioner:
Timothy A. Thomas
Respondent:
Sheriff Bobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramey v. White County Sheriffs Department
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Danny Dewayne Ramey
Defendant:
White County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02121
Petitioner:
Christopher McMillian
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
NelNet Program et al v. Dooley
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
NelNet Program and Antonio Deshone Dooley
Defendant:
Antonio D. Dooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savalli v. Gulledge
as 4:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Ryan Douglas Savalli
Respondent:
Sheriff Gary Gulledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Soto v. Barner et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Reginald Barner, Morgan Stephenson, Eric Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Henson
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Ruben Garcia
Defendant:
Officer J. Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Tavarres Henderson and Juhiiv Ali Muhammed
Respondent:
Mr Terry Bernard
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
