Cases 51 - 60 of 14,685
Underwood v. Cahak
as 2:2024cv01145
Petitioner:
Robert Richard Underwood
Respondent:
Warden Brian Cahak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wildman v. Oshkosh Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2024cv01155
Defendant:
Oshkosh Correctional Institution, Nurse Steuber and Dr Murphy
Plaintiff:
Robert W Wildman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laskoski, Brian v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2024cv00636
Respondent:
Lizzie Tegels
Petitioner:
Brian Laskoski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harmon v. Carr et al
as 2:2024cv01146
Plaintiff:
Joshua W Harmon
Defendant:
Dr Panos, Robert Weinman, Brad Hompe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kernan v. Kerig et al
as 2:2024cv00917
Defendant:
Jada Miller, Neil Thorsen, Kristine Kerig and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Alan Kernan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leventhal v. Ozaukee County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2024cv01147
Defendant:
Ozaukee County Circuit Court, District Attorney Adam Gerol, Known Unnamed Circuit Court Judges and others
Plaintiff:
Howard E Leventhal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Cortes
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Marque Derrion Cummings
Defendant:
Kristina Cortes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Beck et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
D Cromwell, Lt Jeremy Beck, Brian Greff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Rozmarynoski et al
as 2:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
C Stevens, Captain Tonia Rozmarynoski, Lt King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Mathushak et al
as 2:2024cv01152
Defendant:
Rachael Mathushak, K Vanderbush, Derek Henning and others
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
