Cases 71 - 80 of 25,842
Smith v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00971
Defendant:
Ethan Ellis, Kevin Herrington, Quentin Douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Dwayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. Stafford et al
as 5:2024cv00945
Defendant:
Kevin Stafford and John Doe
Plaintiff:
John Benjamin Hickman, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Medical Staff et al
as 6:2024cv01164
Plaintiff:
Brannon James Ross
Defendant:
Medical Staff, Ms Sampe, Lafayette Parish Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. USA
as 3:2024cv00715
Petitioner:
Travis R James
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Tems v. Jefferson
as 5:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Tems
Defendant:
Erica Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baskin v. Unknown Defendant
as 3:2024cv00897
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Plaintiff:
Christopher Baskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01842
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Alexander v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital in Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2024cv00693
Defendant:
R.E. Barrow Treatment Center and Our Lady of the Lake Hospital in Baton Rouge
Plaintiff:
Keith Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Fonitno et al
as 2:2024cv02073
Defendant:
Diamond Dimino, Officer Mizzel, Officer Burgess and others
Plaintiff:
Kecite Renee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Tim Hooper and James M. LeBlanc
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
