Cases 71 - 80 of 3,719
Robinson v. Boyd et al
as 8:2024cv00189
Defendant:
CM Messner, CM Delgado, Taggart Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00166
Petitioner:
Marsavion Watson
Respondent:
Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Welch v. Deaver et al
as 4:2024cv03101
Defendant:
Paul Deaver, Cindy Bassett and Kale B. Burdick
Plaintiff:
Brendan Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Douglas County Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv00185
Defendant:
Lt. Sanduski, Michael Myers, Douglas County Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Thompson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Whitmire
as 8:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez
Respondent:
Don Whitmire
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Nebraska Superior Court
as 8:2024cv00179
Respondent:
Nebraska Superior Court
Petitioner:
Tyriece Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzalez v. Stokey et al
as 4:2024cv03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alexis Gonzalez
Defendant:
Joshua Stokey and Kearney Police Dept,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stump v. Nebraska, buffalo county court
as 8:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Logan Everett Stump
Defendant:
Nebraska, buffalo county court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dewey v. Jeffereys
as 4:2024cv03087
Petitioner:
Michael D. Dewey
Respondent:
Rob Jeffereys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griswold v. Pillen
as 8:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Richard A. Griswold
Respondent:
Jim Pillen
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
