Cases 71 - 80 of 12,667
Jones v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv05090
Defendant:
D. Niles, Sgt. Gonzales, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Trevor Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. Walker et al
as 3:2024cv05634
Defendant:
Kitsap County Jail and T. Walker
Plaintiff:
Danny Joe Barber, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. Bremerton Police Department
as 3:2024cv05618
Defendant:
Bremerton Police Department
Plaintiff:
Danny Joe Barber, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Southard v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01146
Petitioner:
Lewis R Southard
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pessanha-Maule v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05601
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County John Does 1-10 and Nouhoum Sidibe
Plaintiff:
Enjoli Pessanha-Maule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellenwood v. Unfred et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Defendant:
C/O Luke Unfred and C/O Allen Wilson
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Ellenwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morley v. Naphcare Medical Department
as 2:2024cv00254
Defendant:
Naphcare Medical Department
Plaintiff:
Shannon Bruce Morley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Verge
as 2:2024cv01130
Respondent:
Verge
Petitioner:
Neil James Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ruiz-Nieto v. Yakima County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv03110
Defendant:
Yakima County Department of Corrections, Yakima Police Department and Yakima County Superior Court
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ruiz-Nieto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05591
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Kevin D Carson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
