Cases 81 - 90 of 11,025
Mathis v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Lennie Dartez Mathis
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Truong et al
as 5:2024cv00649
Defendant:
Vicki Behenna, Emily Grossnicklaus and Cindy H Truong
Plaintiff:
William Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Sheriff of Canadian County et al
as 5:2024cv00643
Defendant:
Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Austin Moore, Sheriff of Canadian County and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christian v. Stitt et al
as 5:2024cv00850
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt and Steven Harpe
Plaintiff:
Deloray C Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick v. Hamilton et al
as 5:2024cv00847
Defendant:
A Johnson, Casey Hamilton and Ashley Allen
Plaintiff:
Joseph Frederick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vigil v. GEO Group Inc
as 5:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Kevin Vigil
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc doing business as Lawton Correctional and Rehabilitation Facility The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peeples v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00294
Respondent:
Chris Rankins
Petitioner:
Howard Eugene Peeples, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spears v. Louthan
as 4:2024cv00331
Petitioner:
Jared Michael Spears
Respondent:
Dave Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Rankin et al
as 5:2024cv00838
Respondent:
Steven Harpe and C Rankin
Petitioner:
Comic, Walley Adams, Kosmic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Lacosse v. Muskogee County Jail et al
as 6:2024cv00297
Defendant:
Muskogee County Sheriff's Office, Muskogee County Jail and Correctional Officer James
Plaintiff:
Justin Todd Lacosse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
