Cases 1 - 10 of 103,105
Alcala v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2024cv02463
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alcala
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier, Warden Bridgette Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatton v. Unknown Defendants
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Tommie Ray Chatton
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Rickey Delwin Pearson, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. Unknown Robertson Unit Defts
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Rivera
Defendant:
Unknown Robertson Unit Defts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slayton v. William K. Cheadle et al
as 4:2024cv02458
Plaintiff:
Kelly E. Slayton
Defendant:
William K. Cheadle, Danielle McBroom and State Bar Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fregia v. Knox
as 3:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Kirk Asa Fregia, Sr
Defendant:
Kaycie M Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solis v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 1:2024cv00255
Petitioner:
Arturo Solis
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rivera v. Unknown Allred Unit Defendants
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Rivera
Defendant:
Unknown Allred Unit Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Uknown Estelle Unit Defendants
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Rivera
Defendant:
Uknown Estelle Unit Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Unknown Defendant
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Jay G Kelly
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
