Cases 71 - 80 of 13,064
SOUZA et al v. ATI INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01214
Defendant:
STATE STREET GLOBAL ADVISORS TRUST CO. and ATI INC.
Plaintiff:
JOHN SOUZA and KAREN SOUZA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Divens v. Prelude Systems, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01426
Defendant:
Prelude Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jordan Divens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
WILLIAMS v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2024cv04390
Plaintiff:
DONNA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
SASSO v. RGS PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00232
Defendant:
RGS PRODUCTS, INC., REAL TIME INSTALLATION, INC., ROY HAYES and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SASSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
WHITEHEAD v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM et al
as 2:2024cv04375
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM, PENN MEDICINE and THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA doing business as PENN MEDICINE
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WHITEHEAD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
MESSINGER v. SNYDER'S-LANCE, INC.
as 2:2024cv04377
Defendant:
SNYDER'S-LANCE, INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID MESSINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (d)(5)(B) Diversity of Citizenship under CAFA
ARISMAN v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2024cv03038
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JENNA ARISMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
GOTTLIEB v. THE HARTFORD
as 2:2024cv04332
Plaintiff:
KYLE GOTTLIEB
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Wootten v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2024cv04330
Plaintiff:
Debra Wootten
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
HERR v. THE HARTFORD
as 2:2024cv04331
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HERR
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
