Cases 151 - 160 of 94,373
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Waddler v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Milton Larry Waddler, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Myles v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Nicole Renee Myles
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Guerra et al v. Minx Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Dessie Pilek, Jessica Hinton, Jessica Golden and others
Defendant:
Minx Holdings Inc. doing business as Minx Gentlemen's Club and Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Lanham Act
Ochar v. Rubenfield
as 1:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Wilson Ochar
Defendant:
Roy S. Rubenfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Alvarez de Melgar v. Donis et al
as 1:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
Yuri Alvarez de Melgar
Defendant:
Director Antonio Donis and USA Attorney General Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquis v. Taylor
as 7:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
DeVonte Davis Marquis
Defendant:
A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
