Cases 21 - 30 of 17,228
Olivero v. USA 2255
as 8:2024cv01357
Petitioner:
Justina Elena Olivero
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rembold v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv01328
Petitioner:
Donald G. Rembold
Respondent:
William S. Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01334
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Blanchard v. Warden for MCTC et al
as 1:2024cv01325
Plaintiff:
Ray Blanchard
Defendant:
Warden for MCTC and Correctional Officer Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Schneider v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Elliott R. Schneider
Defendant:
Carolyn J. Scruggs, J. Phillip Morgan, William Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Johnson
Defendant:
Sgt. Lewis and CO II Lorke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Turay et al
as 1:2024cv01307
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Thomas
Defendant:
CO II Turay, Sgt. CO III Michael Adelowo, CO II Bayero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv01293
Petitioner:
Thomas Linwood Jones
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Newcomb v. Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center et al
as 1:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Dyron S. Newcomb
Defendant:
Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice Watts
Defendant:
Thompson and PrimeCare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
