Cases 41 - 50 of 13,251
Smith v. Robertson
as 2:2024cv12213
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Smith
Defendant:
Danielle Robertson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv01440
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01443
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv01441
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
GS Holistic, LLC v. SMOKE N SAVE LLC d/b/a SMOKE N SHOP et al
as 1:2024cv00446
Defendant:
SMOKE N SAVE LLC d/b/a SMOKE N SHOP and Michael Adams
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Bath & Body Works, Inc. et al v. Victoria's Secret & Co. et al
as 2:2024cv03882
Defendant:
Victoria's Secret Direct Brand Management, LLC, Victoria's Secret & Co., Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bath & Body Works, Inc. and Bath & Body Works Brand Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
VDPP, LLC v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2024cv12211
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Plaintiff:
VDPP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Grossman v. Velvet Ropes, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01022
Defendant:
Velvet Ropes, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Barry Grossman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
JTH Tax, LLC v. Dhanani et al
as 3:2024cv01026
Defendant:
Ace Tax Service LLC, Saira Aziz Dhanani and Aziz Dhanani
Plaintiff:
JTH Tax, LLC doing business as Liberty Tax Service
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
