Cases 51 - 60 of 49,568
Podlesnik v. Cardona et al
as 6:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Podlesnik
Defendant:
Dr. Miguel A. Cardona and United States Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Song v. Morgan Stanley and Co. LLC
as 3:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Eugenia Song
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley and Co. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wilson v. Highberger
as 6:2024cv00492
Petitioner:
Mark James Wilson
Respondent:
Joshua Highberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Wallace et al
as 6:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant:
Wallace, Dirkson, Garibay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Sheik King Sheik Sheik Sheikh Shabazz
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections and Oregon State Pen.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinsel v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Norman Sinsel
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Grant v. Multnomah County Jail
as 3:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Raymond LaVaughn Grant
Defendant:
Multnomah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
