Cases 81 - 90 of 163,182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Kengne v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01991
Petitioner:
Raissa Djuissi Kengne
Respondent:
Fulton County Jail, Sheriff Patrick Labat, The State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kengne v. The Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01992
Petitioner:
Raissa Djuissi Kengne
Respondent:
The Fulton County Jail and Sheriff Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Demari D. Lee
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Scandrett et al
as 1:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Tariq D. Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Reginald Scandrett, Officer K. Crosby, Officer Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01985
Plaintiff:
William R. Wilborn
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Jason Young and Naylor Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Defendant:
Spencer R. Moore and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tyrone Boykin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Craft v. All Concepts, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Ashlyn Craft
Defendant:
All Concepts, LLC, MTW Cabinetry, LLC, All Concepts USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
