Cases 81 - 90 of 214
Nunes, et al v. Umass Correctional Health, et al
as 13-2346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD D. NUNES, CARL COE, JOHN DOE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH, MA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LEONARD MCGUIRE and others
Lakin v. Barnhart, et al
as 13-2210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LANKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA BARNHART, in her Individual Capacity as Warden, Maine State Prison and MARTIN MAGNUSSON, in his Individual Capacity as Commissioner, Maine Department of Corrections
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, in his Individual Capacity as a Correctional Officer, Maine State Prison
DeSimone v. US
as 13-2198
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROCCO P. DESIMONE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
JOHN AGOSTINI, DAVID M. DURING, ALLAN H. DYER and others
Larkin v. Forensic Health Services, Inc, et al
as 13-2187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. LARKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
FORENSIC HEALTH SERVICES, INC., A subsidiary of Mental Health Management Services, KIM LYMAN, MS LMHC, Clinical Director and others
DeCologero v. US
as 13-1946
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN P. DECOLOGERO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Zambarano v. US
as 13-1764
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN A. ZAMBARANO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Zambarano v. US
as 13-1763
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN A. ZAMBARANO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Carr v. Colon, et al
as 13-1695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODOLFO CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM COLON, MARLON MEDERO, KEVIN FONTAINE and others
Defendant:
BONNIE WERNER, HAROLD W. CLARKE, LUIS SPENCER and others
Nobrega v. Woodcock, et al
as 13-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOMINGOS NOBREGA, a/k/a Domingus Nubrega
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES LAWRENCE MCCARTHY and JOHN A. WOODCOCK
Bunchan v. US
as 13-1562
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BUNCHAN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
JOHN M. NAUGHTON, WEST COAST REALTY SERVICES, INC., WESTERN MUTUAL GROUP, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
