Cases 51 - 60 of 648
Ritter, et al v. Johnson
as 22-1621
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID M. RITTER and DIANE F. RITTER
Plaintiff:
CARA JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellant:
JERRY JOHNSON
Nuance Communications, Inc. v. Kovalenko
as 22-1595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHRYN KOVALENKO
Novi Footwear International Co. Limited v. Earth Opco LLC, et al
as 22-1662
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NOVI FOOTWEAR INTERNATIONAL CO. LIMITED
Defendant / Appellant:
EARTH OPCO LLC, WINDSONG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC and WILLIAM SWEEDLER
Defendant:
SECOND AVENUE CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
Gallagher v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 22-1631
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. GALLAGHER
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Conlin v. Michael, et al
as 22-1615
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEROME P. CONLIN
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL MICHAEL and DANIEL BERMAN
Andersen v. Vagaro, Inc.
as 22-1471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDI ANDERSEN, d/b/a Dharma Nutrition, LLC, d/b/a Dharma Healing Center
Defendant / Appellee:
VAGARO, INC.
Seniorlink Incorporated v. Landry
as 21-1780
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SENIORLINK INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellant:
BETH LANDRY
Interested Party:
THOMAS RILEY
Rojas Andino, et al v. Puerto Rico CVS Pharmacy, LLC, et al
as 22-1382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUZ CELENIA ROJAS ANDINO, THE ESTATE OF JOS RODRGUEZ AQUINO, COMPRISED BY ROMARY RODRGUEZ ROJAS, MARIANNE PREZ MATOS, JACOB RODRGUEZ PREZ AND JAIMEE ANN RODRGUEZ PREZ and THE ESTATE OF JOSE RODRIGUEZ AQUINO, COMPRISED BY ROMARY RODRIGUEZ ROJAS, MARIANNE PEREZ MATOS, JACOB RODRIGUEZ PEREZ, AND JAIMEE ANN RODRIGUEZ PEREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
PUERTO RICO CVS PHARMACY, LLC, CVS PR HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, CVS PR CENTER, INC and others
CRG Financial LLC, et al v. Medea Inc.
as 22-1347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRG FINANCIAL LLC and CLAIMS RECOVERY GROUP LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDEA INC.
Defendant:
TWO DIAMOND CAPITAL CORP.
Interested Party:
COSTCO WHOLESALE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
