Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Washington v. Wall
as 14-1230
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFERY S. WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, Director of the Department of Corrections
Dubois v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 13-2033
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID R. DUBOIS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, A.T. WALL and RI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Chapdelaine v. Wall
as 13-1017
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE B. CHAPDELAINE
Respondent - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, Director of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Barry v. Clarke
as 12-1762
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY J. BARRY
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Correction
Dominguez v. Duval, et al
as 12-1500
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS DOMINGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
RONALD DUVAL, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner for the Department of Corrections and MARTHA COAKLEY, Attorney General
Henderson v. Warden, Maine State Prison, et al
as 11-2028
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOBEY HENDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, MAINE STATE PRISON and MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Fandozzi v. Gerry
as 11-1874
Petitioner - Appellant:
GURRIE FANDOZZI
Respondent - Appellee:
NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE PRISON FOR MEN, Warden Richard Gerry
Interested Party:
NH ATTORNEY GENERAL and NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Barbosa v. Norfolk Superior Court, et al
as 11-1096
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO BARBOSA
Respondent - Appellee:
NORFOLK SUPERIOR COURT and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, of State of Massachusetts
Beltran v. NH Department of Correction
as 10-2250
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BELTRAN
Respondent - Appellee:
NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Respondent:
ANNE MILGRAM, Former NJ Attorney General and WILLIAM WRENN
Hart v. Gerry
as 10-1294
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH H. HART
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD M. GERRY
:
NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and NH ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
