Cases 71 - 80 of 928
Concepcion-Pesquera v. Rodriguez
as 22-1962
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE CONCEPCION-PESQUERA
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL RODRIQUEZ, Superintendent and MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ, Superintendent, MCI-Shirley
Mahoney v. Krueger
as 22-1964
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN E. MAHONEY
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden, MCFP Springfield
Menjivar v. Divris
as 22-1836
Petitioner / Appellant:
JORGE A. MENJIVAR
Respondent / Appellee:
MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent, North Central Correctional Institution at Gardner
Holloway v. Edmark
as 22-1922
Petitioner / Appellant:
DALE E. HOLLOWAY, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison
Doyle v. Coyne-Fague
as 22-1868
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL E. DOYLE, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, in her official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections for the state of Rhode Island and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
St. Jean v. Marchilli
as 22-1846
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHEL ST. JEAN
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MARCHILLI, Superintendent
Seino v. Divris
as 22-1779
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS A. SEINO
Respondent / Appellee:
COLETTE M. GOGUEN, Superintendent, North Central Correctional Institution at Gardner and MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent, North Central Correctional Institution at Gardner
Nunez Perez v. Escobar Pabon, et al
as 22-1749
Petitioner:
DAVID NUNEZ-PEREZ and DAVID NUNEZ PEREZ
Respondent:
HECTOR HERNANDEZ-MORALES, Warden, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, ANA I. ESCOBAR, Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Correction and Rehabilitation and others
Fernandes v. Silva
as 22-1786
Petitioner / Appellant:
ODAIR FERNANDES
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN SILVA
Good v. Gray
as 22-1764
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN J. GOOD, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DEAN GRAY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
