Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1309
Plaintiff / Appellant: MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity, GE BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1310
Plaintiff / Appellant: MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant: WARD BOWMAN and FOLEY AND MANSFIELD LAW FIRM
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1307
Plaintiff / Appellant: MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., CEO of GE, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant: FOLEY AND MANSFIELD LAW FIRM and WARD BOWMAN, Engineering Manager, GE intelligent platforms
Trivedi v. General Electric Company, et al
as 23-1236
Plaintiff / Appellant: MADHURI TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR., in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant: WARD BOWMAN and FOLEY AND MANSFIELD LAW FIRM
Kader, et al v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1139
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM KADER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, MORAD GHODOOSHIM, ROGER LAM and others
Defendant - Appellee: SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS, INC., CHRIS GARABEDIAN, SANDESH MAHATME and others
In Re: Aveo Pharmaceutical
as 15-2514
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT LEVINE and WILLIAM WINDHAM
Plaintiff: PAUL SANDERS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and CHRISTINE KRAUSE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: AVEO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., TUAN HA-NGOC, DAVID N. JOHNSTON and others
Interested Party: SCOTT PRINCIPI and RODNEY A. SAMAAN
Elmachtoub, et al v. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1491
Plaintiff: NABIL ELMACHTOUB, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JAMES L. BURCH, GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' PENSION FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH BRADLEY, PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS, CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Appellee: ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., HARVEY J. BERGER, FRANK G. HALUSKA and others
Defendant: DAVID E. I. PYOTT, MIKE R. BOWLIN, JOHN T. CARDIS and others
Movant: JOSEPH MASSAGLIA, KENNETH CANAWAY, ERSTE-SPARINVEST KAPITALANLAGEGESELLSCHAFT M. B. H. and others
Huckins Williams, et al v. Welch, et al
as 15-1468
Plaintiff: JUDITH HUCKINS WILLIAMS, JAMES P. PELHAM, JR., WILLIAM WEDDLE and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: FELDMAN, SHAPERO, CARTER AND SMITH INVESTOR GROUP, Lead Plaintiff
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK J. WELCH, LISA DONAHUE, TERRENCE RONAN and others
Movant: JOHN TRACY, BELINDA TRACY, BELINDA TRACY and others
Hoff, et al v. Del Carmen Garriga, et al
as 12-1008
Plaintiff - Appellee: RUSELL HOFF, GENERAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT, NILDA PICO and others
Plaintiff: CECI MONTILLA-ROJO, CARLOS CAMINO-RIOS, SONIA SANTIAGO-MARTINEZ and others
: LUISA VIRGINIA FUSTER BERLINGERI
Defendant: POPULAR, INC., RICHARD L. CARRION, JORGE A. JUNQUERA and others
Intervenor: DALMIS PEREZ
Interested Party - Appellant: MARIA DEL CARMEN GARRIGA, ALFREDO CARL MELTZ-NARVAEZ, FRANCISCO LOPEZ-DOSAL and others
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension v. Smith & Wesson Holding Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1436
Plaintiff: WILLIAM HWANG, ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND, DAVID MAURER and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee: SMITH & WESSON CORP., BARRY M. MONHEIT, MICHAEL GOLDEN and others
Movant: VICKI SCALIZILLI and SHEET METAL WORKERS PENSION PLAN OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?