Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 101 - 110 of 127
Surprenant v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authori, et al
as 11-1662
Plaintiff - Appellant: CAROL SURPRENANT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, MASSACHUSETTS PORT AUTHORITY and MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Interested Party: RHODE ISLAND TURNPIKE AND BRIDGE AUTHORITY, DAVID A. DARLINGTON8 and ANN V. JOURNEAY
Coors Brewing Company v. Mendez-Torre We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant: COORS BREWING COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: JUAN C. MENDEZ-TORRES, Secretary of the Treasury Department of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Massachusetts Delivery Associa v. Coakley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1441
Plaintiff - Appellant: MASSACHUSETTS DELIVERY ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee: MARTHA COAKLEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party: STEPHEN REYNOLDS, ALBERG OLIVEIRA, EZEQUIEL ANTONIO GARCIA and others
RI Hospitality Association, et al v. City of Providence We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1415
Plaintiff - Appellant: RI HOSPITALITY ASSOCIATION, PRI I, L.P. and PRI XVIII, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee: PROVIDENCE, RI, by and through its Treasurer, James J. Lombardi III
Amicus Curiae: SEIU 615, HOSPITALITY EMPLOYEES AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS and UNITE HERE LOCAL 217
Villa v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 11-1392
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRIAN L. VILLA
Defendant - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Defendant: CNA SURETY OF CHICAGO AND QUINCY and HINSHAW AND CULBERTSON, LLP OF CHICAGO AND BOSTON, MA
National Organization For Marr v. Daluz, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2304
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN A. DALUZ, in his official capacity as chairman of the Rhode Island Board of Elections, FRANK J. REGO, in his official capacity as vice chairman of the Rhode Island Board of Elections, RICHARD DUBOIS, in his official capacity as member of the Rhode Island Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae: GAY & LESBIAN ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS and COMMON CAUSE RHODE ISLAND
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. US Department of Health & Huma We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2204
Plaintiff - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Defendant - Appellant: US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, US DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and others
McKenna v. Powell, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1820
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVEN A. MCKENNA
Defendant - Appellee: SANDRA POWELL, in her representative capacity and GEORGE HEALY, in his representative capacity
US, et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1668
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES, AMERICAN WATERWAYS OPERATORS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, BIMCO and others
Defendant - Appellant: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, MA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, MITT ROMNEY and others
Defendant: COALITION FOR BUZZARDS BAY, US DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and US COAST GUARD
Interested Party: SAVE THE BAY and AMICI CURIAE
US, et al v. Coalition For Buzzards Bay, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1664
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES, AMERICAN WATERWAYS OPERATORS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, BIMCO and others
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, MA DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, MITT ROMNEY and others
Defendant - Appellant: COALITION FOR BUZZARDS BAY
Interested Party: SAVE THE BAY and AMICI CURIAE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?