Contract Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Doe v. Smith
as 24-1553
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE
Defendant: SARA SMITH
Interested Party: MAINE TRUST FOR LOCAL NEWS L3C, d/b/a Portland Press Herald, d/b/a Maine Sunday Telegram
Fiorillo v. Green, et al
as 22-1839
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO, individually and as Trustee
Plaintiff: OCEAN VACATIONS REALTY TRUST, OCEAN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC and OCEAN REALTY PARTNERS LLC
Defendant / Appellee: RAYMOND GREEN, JOAN GREEN, SPIRO STYLIANOPOULOS and others
Defendant: SMITH DUGGAN BEULL & RUFO LLP, ANDREW P. STEMPLER and OS MANAGEMENT LLC
MAZ Partners LP v. Shear We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1821
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee: BRUCE A. SHEAR
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant: MAZ PARTNERS LP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: PETER BLAKESLEE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: ACADIA HEALTHCARE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant: PHC, INC., DONALD E. ROBAR, DOUGLAS J. SMITH and others
Sarnacki v. Golden, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1414
Plaintiff - Appellant: AARON SARNACKI, derivatively on behalf of Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL F. GOLDEN, JOHN A. KELLY, BARRY M. MONHEIT and others
Smith Marine, Inc. v. Kyle Conti Construction, LLC.
as 13-2347
Plaintiff - Appellee: SMITH MARINE, INC
Defendant - Appellant: KYLE CONTI CONSTRUCTION, LLC
MAZ Partners LP, et al v. PHC, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2273
Plaintiff - Appellant: MAZ PARTNERS LP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and PETER BLAKESLEE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: PHC, INC., BRUCE A. SHEAR, DONALD E. ROBAR and others
Mitchell, et al v. US Airways, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2056
Plaintiff - Appellant: BEN MITCHELL, and all others similarly situated, DONALD CHANDLER, WILMER PRESTON, and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: US AIRWAYS, INC. and PRIME FLIGHT AVIATION SERVICES, INC.
Interested Party: COREY EADDY, TIMOTHY ROBINSON, MARSHAL GLASS and others
In Re: Hannaford Bros Co. Cust
as 10-2450
Plaintiff - Appellee: PAMELA WILLIAMS, LORI VALBURN, SARAH GAGNON and others
Plaintiff: BODYWORKS HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, d/b/a Planet Fitness, BODYWORKS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, d/b/a Planet Fitness and THOMAS T. GRIMSDALE, III
Defendant - Appellant: HANNAFORD BROTHERS CO.
Defendant: KASH N KARRY FOOD STORES INC., d/b/a Sweetbay Supermarkets, a/k/a Sweetbay Liquors and DELHAIZE AMERICA INC., d/b/a Sweetbay
Prime Tanning Co., Inc., et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Compa
as 10-2427
Plaintiff - Appellant: PRIME TANNING CO., INC. and PRIME TANNING CORP.
Defendant - Appellee: LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Intervenor: JILL SMITH, SANDRA TURNER, GINA SMITH and others
Type: Contract Insurance
In Re: Hannaford Bros Co. Cust We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2384
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN ANDERSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, MICHAEL CYR, ELIZABETH DOWD, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff: BODYWORKS HEALTH AND FITNESS CENTER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, d/b/a Planet Fitness, BODYWORKS MANAGEMENT COMPANY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, d/b/a Planet Fitness, LEONARD ASSNER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: KASH N KARRY FOOD STORES INC., d/b/a Sweetbay Supermarkets, a/k/a Sweetbay Liquors, DELHAIZE AMERICA INC., d/b/a Sweetbay and HANNAFORD BROTHERS CO.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?