Cases 31 - 40 of 625
In Re: Lu
as 22-1324
Petitioner:
FRIEDRICH LU
Respondent:
PAUL LAPROCINA, JR., MICHAEL J. LEPIZZERA, JR., SCOTT KEVIN DEMELLO and others
US v. Colburn
as 22-1305
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY COLBURN
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, WILLIAM RICK SINGER, WILLIAMS & OLDS, CPAS and others
US v. Colburn
as 22-1304
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
AMY COLBURN
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, WILLIAM RICK SINGER, WILLIAMS & OLDS, CPAS and others
Armfield v. Williams
as 22-1263
Petitioner:
RUSSELL ARMFIELD
Respondent:
TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden, Dixon Correctional Center
City of Quincy, MA, et al v. FERC
as 22-1201
Petitioner:
QUINCY, MA, BRAINTREE, MA and FORE RIVER RESIDENTS AGAINST THE COMPRESSOR STATION (FRRACS)
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Interested Party:
SANDRA PETERS, REBECCA HAUGH, GARY PETERS and others
US v. Wilson
as 22-1138
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN WILSON
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, WILLIAM RICK SINGER, WILLIAMS & OLDS, CPAS and others
US v. Abdelaziz
as 22-1129
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
GAMAL ABDELAZIZ
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, WILLIAM RICK SINGER, WILLIAMS & OLDS, CPAS and others
US v. Williams
as 22-1035
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
DURRELL WILLIAMS, a/k/a D-Block
Muehe, et al v. Norkunas
as 21-1981
Interested Party:
WILLIAM NORKUNAS, class member
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN FLANAGAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CRYSTAL EVANS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, MICHAEL MUEHE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and ELAINE HAMILTON, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON, MA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
