Cases 101 - 110 of 2,677
Mahoney v. US
as 23-1644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN E. MAHONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Saint-Vil v. Alves
as 23-1571
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHNAVON SAINT-VIL
Respondent / Appellee:
NELSON ALVES, MCI Norfolk
Ardaneh v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 23-1634
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAMID REZA ARDANEH
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, KRISTEN BUXTON, Trial Judge of The Middlesex Superior Court, CEARA MAHONEY, Assistant Middlesex District Attorney and others
Ausar v. Salisbury
as 23-1550
Petitioner / Appellant:
KAM AUSAR, a/k/a Jeffrey Alston
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
Arias v. Herzon, et al
as 23-1618
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT RANIERY ARIAS
Defendant / Appellee:
NOAH A. HERZON, JUAN INFANTE, TY KURCHARSKI and others
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT and US DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Wedington v. U.S. Federal Government
as 23-1637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Czekalski v. Hanks, et al
as 23-1561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON A. CZEKALSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
HELEN HANKS, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Corrections, in both her individual and official capacities, JAMES DALY, Chaplain, New Hampshire State Prison, in both his individual and official capacities and JAMES DALY, Chaplain, New Hampshire State Prison for Men, in both his individual and official capacities
Munir v. Suttell
as 23-1598
Petitioner / Appellant:
HASIM MUNIR
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL A. SUTTELL, Chief Justice of the Rhode Island Supreme Court
Aguiar v. Boncher
as 23-1545
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN AGUIAR
Respondent / Appellee:
AMY BONCHER
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Thomas
as 23-1562
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRENCE THOMAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
