Cases 61 - 70 of 2,684
Rodrigues v. Rodrigues
as 23-2012
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTONIO RODRIGUES
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL RODRIGUES, Superintendent, MCI Shirley Medium
Lane-Bey v. Alfred Lane T98017, et al
as 23-1993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED DARNELL LANE-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ALFRED DARNELL LANE T98017, MAURA TRACY HEALEY, Governor, State of Massachusetts, in her individual and official capacity, SHAWN P. JENKINS, Chief of Staff, Massachusetts Department of Correction, in his individual and official capacity and others
Noble v. Napier
as 23-1994
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Respondent / Appellee:
STEPHANIE NAPIER, Acting Warden, FMC Devens
Celester v. Rodrigues
as 23-1973
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERMAINE CELESTER
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL RODRIGUES and MICHAEL RODRIGUES, Superintendent of MCI Shirley
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al v. Paiva
as 23-1919
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE PAIVA
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. PALMIGIANO, WILLIAM J. O'BRIEN, JOHN F. PIERCE and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC DAY, WILLIAM THOMAS, DANIEL SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF RI
Interested Party:
KENNETH WILSON, CHRISTOPHER HADLEY, NORMAN WHEELER and others
Winkleman v. Hazlewood
as 23-1942
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN F. WINKLEMAN, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT HAZLEWOOD, Warden, FCI Berlin
Lopez-Soto v. US
as 23-1930
Petitioner / Appellant:
CARLOS ENRIQUE LOPEZ-SOTO
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Etienne v. Edmark
as 23-1946
Petitioner / Appellant:
DICKENS ETIENNE
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, NH State Prison
Santiago-Colon v. US
as 23-1912
Petitioner / Appellant:
NELSON SANTIAGO-COLON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Rodriguez-Isaac v. US
as 23-1916
Petitioner / Appellant:
EMANUEL RODRIGUEZ-ISAAC
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
