Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Forte v. Medeiro
as 17-1298
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL B. FORTE
Respondent - Appellee: SEAN MEDEIROS, Superintendent
Nieves-Alicea v. Nelson, et al
as 12-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERTO NIEVES-ALICEA
Defendant - Appellee: KENNETH NELSON, Superintendent, Bridgewater State Hospital, BRIAN D. FRYE, Director of Security, Bridgewater State Hospital, ROBERT R. DENEAULT, Lieutenant, Bridgewater State Hospital and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Graham, Jr. v. Grondolsky, et al
as 12-1361
Petitioner - Appellant: EMMETT MADISON GRAHAM, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES, JEFFREY GRONDOLSKY, Warden, Fort Devens, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Forte v. Dickhaut
as 11-2434
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL B. FORTE
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
Graham v. Grondolsky
as 10-2035
Petitioner - Appellant: EMMETT MADISON GRAHAM, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: JEFF GRONDOLSKY, Warden, Fort Devens
Forte v. Hampden County, et al
as 09-1238
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL B. FORTE
Defendant - Appellee: HAMPDEN COUNTY, MARY LOU RUP, ELDON WALLEN and others
Judd v. Bailey
as 08-1506
Petitioner - Appellant: KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee: NANCY BAILEY, Warden, FCI Fort Dix, New Jersy
Judd v. Bailey
as 08-1338
Petitioner - Appellant: KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee: NANCY BAILEY, Warden, FCI Fort Dix, New Jersy
Judd v. Bailey
as 08-1253
Petitioner - Appellant: KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee: NANCY BAILEY, Warden, FCI Fort Dix, New Jersy
Hanna v. Secretary of Army, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1090
Petitioner - Appellee: MARY HANNA, Captain, U.S. Army Reserve
Respondent - Appellant: SECRETARY OF THE ARMY and COMMANDER, 94TH COMMANDER, 94TH REGIONAL READINESS COMMAND, Fort Devens, Massachusetts

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?