Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Maldonado-Pagan v. Negron-Fernandez
as 16-1383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIANO MALDONADO-PAGAN
Plaintiff:
ANGEL L. ORTIZ-HADDOCK, VICENTE GARCIA-GONZALEZ, AUGUSTUS CHRISTOPHER LIND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE R. NEGRON FERNANDEZ, Administrator of the Juvenile Institution Administration and CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION
Crotty v. Massachusetts Parole Board, et al
as 12-1360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CROTTY
Defendant - Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD, MARK A. CONRAD, individually and in their capacity as members of the Massachusetts Parole Board, CANDACE KOCHIN, individually and in their capacity as members of the Massachusetts Parole Board and others
Phillips v. Conrad, et al
as 11-1174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH L. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MA PAROLE BOARD
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK A. CONRAD, individually and in his capacity as Chairman of the Massachusetts Parole Board, ROGER MICHEL, individually and in his capacity as a member of the Massachusetts Parole Board, CEASAR ARCHILLA, individually and in his capacity as a member of the Massachusetts Parole Board and others
Jimenez v. Conrad, et al
as 11-1180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLANDO JIMENEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK CONRAD, voting Member and Chairman of the Massachusetts Parole Board, DORIS DOTTRIDGE, voting member of the Massachusetts Parole Board, CANDANCE KOCHIN, voting member of the Massachusetts Parole Board and others
Seaver v. MA Parole Board, et al
as 10-2454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SEAVER
Defendant - Appellee:
MA PAROLE BOARD, MARK CONRAD, in his individual capacity, DORIS DOTTRIDGE, in her individual capacity and others
Movant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LOUIS FABBRI
Seaver, et al v. Conrad, et al
as 10-1445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SEAVER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK CONRAD, in his individual capacity, DORIS DOTTRIDGE, in her individual capacity, CANDACE KOCHIN, in her individual capacity and others
Defendant:
MA PAROLE BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
