Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Lyons v. Grondolsky, et al
as 16-1433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEON LORENZO LYONS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY GRONDOLSKY, LINDA SANDERS, UNITED STATES and others
Hudson, et al v. Spencer, et al
as 15-2323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAC S. HUDSON, FARADAN S.I. SALAHUDDIN, EDGAR ROCK and others
Plaintiff:
KEON J. GODFREY, JOHN HULLUMS, JAMES BELL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LUIS S. SPENCER, acting Commissioner of the Department of Corrections, CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL, Director of Programs and Re-entry for the DOC, BRUCE GELB, Superintendent MCI-Concord and others
Herbert v. Dickhaut
as 11-1888
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER HERBERT
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent of Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
Respondent:
LOIS A. RUSSO, former Superintendent of Souza Baranowski Correctional Center
Hennessy v. Clarke, et al
as 10-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDMUND HENNESSY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SOUZA-BARANOWSKI CORRECTIONAL CENTER, MCI-SHIRLEY MEDIUM and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN DENNEHY, HAROLD W. CLARKE, LOIS A. RUSSO and others
Medina v. Russo, et al
as 10-1999
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY MEDINA
Respondent - Appellee:
LOIS RUSSO, Superintendent and THOMAS REILLY, Attorney General
Alves v. Russo
as 10-1665
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE ALVES
Respondent - Appellee:
LOIS RUSSO, Superintendent, Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
Hannon, et al v. Beard, et al
as 09-2543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS HANNON, RAYMOND COOK, JOSE ALVES and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KEITH
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, MITT ROMNEY, KATHLEEN DENNEHY, Commissioner and others
Fowlkes v. Dennehy, et al
as 09-2394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELIPE OTEZE FOWLKES
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN M. DENNEHY, KRISTIE LADOUCER, LOIS RUSSO and others
Jackson v. Russo
as 09-1170
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEONARD JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LOIS RUSSO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
